Positive Definite ℓ1\ell_1 Penalized Estimation of Large Covariance Matrices

The thresholding covariance estimator has nice asymptotic properties for estimating sparse large covariance matrices, but it often has negative eigenvalues when used in real data analysis. To simultaneously achieve sparsity and positive definiteness, we develop a positive definite $\ell_1$-penalized covariance estimator for estimating sparse large covariance matrices. An efficient alternating direction method is derived to solve the challenging optimization problem and its convergence properties are established. Under weak regularity conditions, non-asymptotic statistical theory is also established for the proposed estimator. The competitive finite-sample performance of our proposal is demonstrated by both simulation and real applications.Comment: accepted by JASA, August 201

Alternating Direction Methods for Latent Variable Gaussian Graphical Model Selection

Chandrasekaran, Parrilo and Willsky (2010) proposed a convex optimization problem to characterize graphical model selection in the presence of unobserved variables. This convex optimization problem aims to estimate an inverse covariance matrix that can be decomposed into a sparse matrix minus a low-rank matrix from sample data. Solving this convex optimization problem is very challenging, especially for large problems. In this paper, we propose two alternating direction methods for solving this problem. The first method is to apply the classical alternating direction method of multipliers to solve the problem as a consensus problem. The second method is a proximal gradient based alternating direction method of multipliers. Our methods exploit and take advantage of the special structure of the problem and thus can solve large problems very efficiently. Global convergence result is established for the proposed methods. Numerical results on both synthetic data and gene expression data show that our methods usually solve problems with one million variables in one to two minutes, and are usually five to thirty five times faster than a state-of-the-art Newton-CG proximal point algorithm